Skip to main content
· 3/9/1994

Olga Nubia Ceja De Brown v. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service Board of Immigration Appeal

Citations

  • 18 F.3d 774
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1740
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 3133
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4101
  • 1994 WL 68482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding mother’s testimony and affidavits from two witnesses to birth did not rebut Mexican birth certificate
  • finding no error when the BIA affirmed the IJ’s conclusion after applying a different standard 4 The IJ appears to have relied on the language in 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(b
  • “Actions under § 1983 and those under Bivens are identical 19 save for the replacement of a state actor under § 1983 by a federal actor under Bivens.” 20 (quoting Van Strum v. Lawn, 940 F.2d 406, 409 (9th Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Garth, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.