Olendorff v. St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contractor injured during a one-time installation of height restrictors was covered because he “routinely performed [other] maintenance on structures”
• holding “the absence of a specific provision in the contract” providing for either the installation or maintenance of height restrictors was not fatal to the existence of statutory employment
• emphasizing the importance of the “type of maintenance work contemplated by and regularly performed” under an agreement (emphasis added)
• installing height restrictors in a parking garage
• applying § 287.040.1 to a contractor’s employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).