Olen C. FAULK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, Howard Jewett, Albert Nelson and Edward Hanna, Defendants-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that for purposes of sufficiency review, the pro se petitioner’s complaint encompassed the initial submission and subsequent efforts to amend complaint, consistent with the “established rule of liberal construction for pro se pleadings”
• construing pro se plaintiff’s three pleadings together as one complaint in determining whether plaintiff stated claim
• construing pro se plaintiff’s three pleadings together as one complaint in determining whether plaintiff stated claim
• construing pro se plaintiff’s three pleadings together in determining whether plaintiff stated claim
• reversing the dismissal of a section 1981 count for failure to state a claim when the pro se plaintiff alleged that individuals outside his race did not suffer the same adverse action as him even though they engaged in similar misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).