Skip to main content
· 11/9/1993

Olefins Trading, Inc. v. Han Yang Chem Corporation

Citations

  • 9 F.3d 282
  • 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 39
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28970
  • 1993 WL 454465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to establish a First Amendment retaliation claim, a plaintiff must show, inter alia, a causal link between the constitutionally protected conduct and the retaliatory action
  • reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
  • reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
  • reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
  • reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
  • reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansmann, Greenberg, Weis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.