· 11/9/1993
Olefins Trading, Inc. v. Han Yang Chem Corporation
Citations
- 9 F.3d 282
- 22 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 39
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28970
- 1993 WL 454465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that to establish a First Amendment retaliation claim, a plaintiff must show, inter alia, a causal link between the constitutionally protected conduct and the retaliatory action
- reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
- reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
- reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
- reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
- reviewing district court’s grant or denial of new trial motion under deferential “abuse of discretion” standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mansmann, Greenberg, Weis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.