Olds & Whipple, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting section 277(b) of the 1926 Revenue Act, the predecessor of section 6503(a)(1
• interpreting section 277(b) of the 1926 Revenue Act, the predecessor of section 6503(a)(1
• interpreting section 277(b) of the 1926 Revenue Act, the predecessor of section 6503(a)(1
• interpreting section 277(b) of the 1926 Revenue Act, the predecessor of section 6503(a)(1
• \There is nothing to indicate that Congress intended in any case to shorten the period of limitation\
• “There is nothing to indicate that Congress intended in any case to shorten the period of limitation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).