Skip to main content
· 4/20/2007

Olds v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 955 So. 2d 1162
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5796
  • 2007 WL 1159658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that contract did not exist because agreement was not sufficiently definite and remanding case for new trial to permit consideration by fact finder of promissory estoppel claim predicated on same facts
  • concluding that plaintiff produced insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict on a breach of contract claim and remanding for a new trial as to plaintiffs claim of promissory estoppel
  • noting that defendant raised \the special defense of the statute of frauds\
  • reversing judgment and remanding case with direction to render judgment for defendant on breach of contract count where plaintiff produced insufficient evidence
  • agreement to make a loan that is not definite as to amount is not enforceable
  • stating an “agreement to agree” is not a binding contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casanueva, Fulmer, Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.