Skip to main content

Oldroyd v. Kanjo

Citations

  • 432 P.3d 879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting Court had not had prior occasion to consider Rule 4(w) but substantial federal precedent existed to provide guidance
  • “Because the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure are patterned after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, federal court interpretations of their rules are highly persuasive in our interpretation of the corresponding Wyoming rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boomgaarden, Burke, Davis, Fox, Kautz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.