Skip to main content
· 9/17/1937

Oldham v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 36 B.T.A. 523
  • 1937 BTA LEXIS 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to strike CASA brief and noting that \[t]he appellate court has discretion to accept such a brief for filing.\
  • observing, citing GALR 2(j) and GALR 4(h), that “guardian ad litem is treated as a party, but only for certain purposes and only in superior court” (emphasis added)
  • observing, citing GALR 2(j) and GALR 4(h), that “guardian ad litem is treated as a party, but only for certain purposes and only in superior court” (emphasis added)
  • Department's duty is to provide all services that are reasonably available in the facility where the parent is confined
  • the Department's duty is to prove all services that are reasonably available in the facility where the parent is confined
  • court will disregard unambiguous statutory language if necessary to avoid an absurd result (citing State v. McDougal, 120 Wn.2d 334, 351-52, 841 P.2d 1232 (1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.