Oldetyme Distillers, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, under the totality of the circumstances, an officer would have reasonably understood that the defendant’s query about “when she could call a lawyer” was an invocation of her right to counsel
• “[M]erely informing [the defendant] of the same rights that she had been aware of before her query regarding an attorney was not sufficient to clarify her intent.”
• “As part of that consideration, we assess any differences between the quality of the erroneously admitted evidence and other evidence admitted on the same issue.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• the defendant asked “when she could call a lawyer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).