Old Mason's Home of Kentucky, Inc. v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no evidence to justify invoking a tolling statute where the defendant informed the plaintiff that it was continuing to investigate the cause of the problems
• noting that statute of limitations was triggered “at the time when [the plaintiff] discovered the problems about which it seeks redress”
• “Having concluded that the applicable statute of limitations is that prescribed in KRS 413.245, it follows that [the plain- tiff]’s reliance upon KRS 413.190(2) is misplaced.”
• applying KRS § 413.245 to claims regarding a defendant’s “alleged failure . . . to provide quality work and to properly supervise work on the construction project”
• professional services in KRS 413.245 include those of an architect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).