Old Lewis Hunter Distillery Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agency can consider mitigation effects that minimize the impacts of a project in determining the significance of the project's environmental impact
• holding that an agency can consider mitigation effects that minimize the impacts of a project in determining the significance of the project’s environmental impact
• holding that federal review of Section 706(1) claims is not confined to the administrative record in existence “at any single point in time, because there is no final agency action to demarcate the limits of the record”
• holding that federal review of Section 706(1) claims is not confined to the administrative record in existence “at any single point in time, because there is no final agency action to demarcate the limits of the record.”
• stating that it is only “incumbent on the Forest 27 Service to evaluate the existing EIS to determine whether it required supplementation” when 28 presented with new, important information
• denying injunctive relief as a result of further agency studies to supplement an EIS that initially violated NEPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).