Old Holdings, Ltd. v. TAPLIN, HOWARD, SHAW & MILLER, PA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where documents may be protected by both the attorney-client privilege and the work-produet doctrine, the petitioners are entitled to an in camera review of the documents by the trial court prior to disclosure
• finding that where documents may be protected by both the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine, the petitioners are entitled to an in camera review of the documents by the trial court prior to disclosure
• finding that where documents may be protected from discovery by both the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine, the petitioners are entitled to an in camera review of the documents by the trial court prior to disclosure
• finding that where documents may be protected from discovery by both the attorney-client privilege and the work-product doctrine, the petitioners are entitled to an in camera review of the documents by the trial court prior to disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).