Old Ben Coal Co. v. Human Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• coming to the same conclusion: “both proponents and opponents of the amendment considered sexual harassment to be prohibited by the *** Human Rights Act as a form of sex discrimination and that the amendment was needed only to clarify this proscription” (emphasis added)
• coming to the same conclusion: “both proponents and opponents of the amendment considered sexual harassment to be prohibited by the *** Human Rights Act as a form of sex discrimination and that the amendment was needed only to clarify this proscription” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).