Olatunji v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “hold[ing] that [the] plaintiff cannot maintain an independent cause of action under § 1981 against the District of Columbia”
• dismissing Title VII claim filed four days after 90-day period ran
• “Monell rejects a respondeat superior theory of municipal liability; the District cannot be held liable simply because it employs a wrongdoer.”
• one year, four months: charge filed in February 2009, right-to-sue notice issued in June 2010

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).