Olalde-Velasquez v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering “the ‘mundane’ and (continued...) – 14 – 2665 In other words, it is not enough for Powell to simply show that the law has changed to obtain equitable relief under Rule 60(b)(6
• denying defendant relief under Rule 60(b)(6) despite change in law because “Nash could have appealed and made the arguments that the petitioners made in [the cases that changed the law]” and “[h]is failure to do so does not make the circumstances of his case extraordinary”
• “Wisconsin law expressly allows—indeed, in most cases requires—defendants to raise claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as part of a consolidated and counseled direct appeal, and provides an opportunity to develop an expanded record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).