Skip to main content
· 2/9/1978

Olaf Nielson v. Armstrong Rubber Company

Citations

  • 570 F.2d 272
  • 24 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1030
  • 2 Fed. R. Serv. 974
  • 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12694

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding abuse of discretion to deny motion to amend complaint to add strict products liability claim to negligence claim already alleged
  • holding abuse of discretion to deny motion to amend complaint to add strict products liability claim to negligence claim already alleged
  • holding abuse of discretion to deny motion to amend complaint to add strict products liability claim to negligence claim already alleged
  • upholding district court's allowance of amendment offered at close of evidence where opposing party did not object to evidence relating to amendment and failed to establish prejudice
  • upholding district court’s allowance of amendment offered at close of evidence where opposing party did not object to evidence relating to amendment and failed to establish prejudice
  • failure to object to evidence contrary to pretrial order foreclosed objection on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster, Henley, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.