Skip to main content
· 7/6/2022

Okuda v. United States

Syllabus

REPORTED OPINION DISMISSING CASE: plaintiff's motion to supplement the administrative record is DENIED,defendant's [16] motion to dismiss is DENIED, defendant's [16] motion for judgment on the administrative record is GRANTED, and plaintiff's [28] cross-motion for judgment on the administrative record is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to ENTER judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Armando O. Bonilla. (ead) Service on parties made.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding Commerce’s use of adverse BIA where respondent failed to report any home market sales because to do so would have required a manual review of all sales

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armando O. Bonilla

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.