Skip to main content
· 1/26/1989

Okrand v. City of Los Angeles

Citations

  • 207 Cal. App. 3d 566
  • 254 Cal. Rptr. 913
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the unlit Katowitz Menorah displayed at city hall did not violate the Establishment Clause in part because “its unique historical background [made it] much more a museum piece than a symbol of religious worship”
  • \ 'California's constitutional provisions are more comprehensive than those of the federal Constitution.' \
  • ‘“California’s constitutional provisions are more comprehensive than those of the federal Constitution.’ ”
  • display with menorah included, among other objects, a Christmas tree
  • display with menorah included, among other objects, a Christmas tree
  • “California’s constitutional provisions are more comprehensive than those of the' federal Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.