Okoye v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal and issuance of filing injunction where plaintiff had a history of engaging in “harassing, duplicative, and vexatious litigation” against the defendants
• affirming dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims based on “federal mail fraud statutes” under Rule 12(b)(6) because there is no “private cause of action”
• noting “twelve other actions in either federal or state courts throughout the United States”
• noting “twelve other actions in either federal or state courts throughout the United States”
• “With respect to the extortion claim, [p]laintiffs have not identified a private cause of action under either federal or state law, and the Court is not aware of one.”
• “With respect to the extortion claim, Plaintiffs have not identified a private cause of action under either federal or state law, and the Court is not aware of one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).