· 8/28/2006
Okoro v. City of Oakland
Citations
- 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 260
- 142 Cal. App. 4th 306
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 11467
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing, but declining to resolve, the conflict between the two conflicting appellate interpretations of 1367(d)
- applying the 11 six-month limitations period provided by section 945.6(a)(1) to suits against public entities and 12 public employees acting in the scope of their employment
- applying the 14 six-month limitations period provided by section 945.6(a)(1) to suits against public entities and 15 public employees acting in the scope of their employment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reardon (Thomas)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.