Skip to main content
· 8/28/2006

Okoro v. City of Oakland

Citations

  • 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 260
  • 142 Cal. App. 4th 306
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 11467
  • 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing, but declining to resolve, the conflict between the two conflicting appellate interpretations of 1367(d)
  • applying the 11 six-month limitations period provided by section 945.6(a)(1) to suits against public entities and 12 public employees acting in the scope of their employment
  • applying the 14 six-month limitations period provided by section 945.6(a)(1) to suits against public entities and 15 public employees acting in the scope of their employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reardon (Thomas)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.