Oklahoma Ex Rel. West, Attorney General v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Citations
- 220 U.S. 290
- 31 S. Ct. 437
- 55 L. Ed. 469
- 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1676
Syllabus
<p>Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., ante, p. 277, followed to effect that a State cannot invoke the original jurisdiction of this court by suit against individual defendants on its behalf where the primary .purpose is to protect citizens generally against violation of its own laws by the defendants.</p> <p>A State cannot invoke the original jurisdiction of this court to enforce a judgment rendered in its courts for a violation of its penal or .criminal laws, Wisconsin v. Pelican Insurance Company, 127 U. S. 265, or to enforce a penal statute.</p> <p>A suit by a State, to enjoin carriers from conveying 'intoxicating liquors into its territory or an Indian reservation therein, is one to enforce by injunction regulations prescribed by the State for violations of its own penal statutes and is not within the original jurisdiction of this court; and so held as to a suit brought by the State of Oklahoma to enjoin railway and express companies from introducing liquor into its territory.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- identifying “rule that the courts of no country execute the penal laws of another” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.