Skip to main content
· 7/3/1940

Oklahoma City Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 114 F.2d 368
  • 25 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 642
  • 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3124
  • 25 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the test to determine if a DOCCS Rule of Inmate Behavior is unconstitutionally vague as applied
  • scrutinizing “closely” a prison regulation 19 prohibiting religious services because its penalties were 20 more akin to criminal than civil penalties
  • “[T]he uncontested evidence at trial was that an inmate may not be punished for violating a Directive.”
  • invalidating a prison administrative prohibition as unconstitutionally vague as applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.