· 2/20/2004
O'KEEFE v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
Citations
- 84 P.3d 613
- 32 Kan. App. 2d 474
- 2004 Kan. App. LEXIS 159
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that same claim was raised in second suit because it arose out of same operative facts as first suit, even though claims were based on different legal theories arising out of those facts
- whether res judicata applies in a certain situation is an issue of law with an unlimited de novo review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Marquardt, Malone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.