Skip to main content
· 2/20/2004

O'KEEFE v. Merrill Lynch & Co.

Citations

  • 84 P.3d 613
  • 32 Kan. App. 2d 474
  • 2004 Kan. App. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that same claim was raised in second suit because it arose out of same operative facts as first suit, even though claims were based on different legal theories arising out of those facts
  • whether res judicata applies in a certain situation is an issue of law with an unlimited de novo review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Marquardt, Malone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.