O'KANE v. Board of Appeals of Hingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that by enacting G.L.c. 40A, §15, the legislature intended “to avoid [the] perpetual ‘cloud’ ” of the filing process “ [being] protracted indefinitely”
• holding that by enacting G.L.c. 40A, §15, the legislature intended “to avoid [the] perpetual ‘cloud’ ” of the filing process “[being] protracted indefinitely”
• requirement that board of appeals “act” on variance application within seventy-five days met if board decides within that period, even if decision not filed with town clerk until after period expires

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).