O.K. Sand & Gravel, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. Martin Marietta Technologies, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a verdict form indicates that the jury never reached the instruction in question, error is typically harmless
• stating that there must be showing that “ ‘violation was a material element of, and substantial factor in, producing the injury’ ”
• holding that antitrust injury requires “not only that the injury is of the type intended to be protected by the antitrust laws, but that the violation was ‘the cause-in-fact of the injury: that but for the violation, the injury would not have occurred’”
• single renewal of agreement after knowledge of breach while producer demanded more information was not ongoing acquiescence required to establish waiver
• “increased prices” cause competitors “no injury, let alone an- titrust injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).