Ojeda-Terrazas v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court of appeals’ statutory jurisdiction over “final orders of removal” extends to reinstatement orders
• holding that a re- instatement decision “is not literally an ‘order of removal’ [8 No. 21-2284 55 U.S.C. § 1252(b
• holding that a re- instatement decision “is not literally an ‘order of removal’ [8 No. 21-2284 55 U.S.C. § 1252(b
• holding that a re- instatement decision “is not literally an ‘order of removal’ [8 No. 21-2284 55 U.S.C. § 1252(b
• holding that a re- instatement decision “is not literally an ‘order of removal’ [8 No. 21-2284 55 U.S.C. § 1252(b
• holding that a re- instatement decision “is not literally an ‘order of removal’ [8 No. 21-2284 55 U.S.C. § 1252(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).