Oishi v. Ganel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Society satisfied the requirements of Hunt and thus had standing to litigate alleged violations of its members voting rights
• holding that the Society satisfied the requirements of Hunt and thus had standing to litigate alleged violations of its members voting rights
• holding that the Society satisfied the requirements of Hunt and thus had standing to litigate alleged violations of its members voting rights
• holding that, for standing purposes, a potential juror who would not swear to her belief in God \is ... aggrieved by being excluded from jury duty because of her lack of religious belief\
• holding that, for standing purposes, a potential juror who would not swear to her belief in God “is ... aggrieved by being excluded from jury duty because of her lack of religious belief’
• explaining that an injury to the “fundamental right to vote” can qualify as an injury in fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).