Skip to main content
· 12/10/1976

Oili v. Chang

Citations

  • 557 P.2d 787
  • 57 Haw. 411
  • 1976 Haw. LEXIS 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that habeas petitions that would require an evidentiary hearing must be filed in the circuit court
  • the supreme court will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings when no special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction”
  • the supreme court “will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings when relief is available in a lower court and no special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction”
  • the supreme court “will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings when relief is available in a lower court and no special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction”
  • the supreme court “will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings when relief is available in a lower court and no special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction”
  • “[The supreme] court will not exercise its original jurisdiction in habeas corpus proceedings when relief is available in a lower court and no special reason exists for invoking its jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Kobayashi, Ogata, Menor, Kidwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.