Skip to main content
· 7/13/1979

Ohlsen v. E. D.

Citations

  • 283 N.W.2d 83
  • 1979 N.D. LEXIS 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that suit limitation provision violated public policy in \circumstances in which there is a strongly held public policy interest at issue.\
  • holding that the contractual limitation period was invalid on public policy grounds because it impermissibly infringed on Pfeifer’s right to bring a retaliatory discharge claim under the Workers Compensation Act
  • discussing the 8 lifetime of this statute, which eventually became G.S. 1949, 60-306, Seventh

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickstad, Paulson, Pederson, Sand, Walle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.