Skip to main content
· 12/1/1981

Ohlsen v. Dst Industries, Inc

Citations

  • 314 N.W.2d 699
  • 111 Mich. App. 580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the remedies provided in MiOSHA are exclusive
  • the claim was denied where the employee also sued under miosha provisions that prohibited discharge in retaliation for the employee’s exercise of statutory rights
  • the claim was denied where the employee also sued under MIOSHA provisions that prohibited discharge in retaliation for the employee's exercise of statutory rights
  • there is no common law right to refuse to work upon alleging an unsafe workplace therefore the administrative remedy in MI-OSHA is exclusive and not cumulative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danhof, Walsh, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.