· 12/1/1981
Ohlsen v. Dst Industries, Inc
Citations
- 314 N.W.2d 699
- 111 Mich. App. 580
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the remedies provided in MiOSHA are exclusive
- the claim was denied where the employee also sued under miosha provisions that prohibited discharge in retaliation for the employee’s exercise of statutory rights
- the claim was denied where the employee also sued under MIOSHA provisions that prohibited discharge in retaliation for the employee's exercise of statutory rights
- there is no common law right to refuse to work upon alleging an unsafe workplace therefore the administrative remedy in MI-OSHA is exclusive and not cumulative
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Danhof, Walsh, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.