Skip to main content
· 2/26/1979

Ohland v. City of Montpelier

Citations

  • 467 F. Supp. 324
  • 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2975
  • 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no remedy implied under the fourteenth amendment even where existence of § 1983 cause of action unclear
  • “Because he could have been discharged only for cause, plaintiff had a property interest in his employment that was entitled to constitutional protection.”
  • “Because he could have been discharged only for cause, plaintiff had a property interest in his employment that was entitled to constitutional protection.”
  • “Because he could have been discharged only for cause, plaintiff had a property interest in his employment that was entitled to constitutional protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffrin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.