· 2/26/1979
Ohland v. City of Montpelier
Citations
- 467 F. Supp. 324
- 100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2975
- 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no remedy implied under the fourteenth amendment even where existence of § 1983 cause of action unclear
- “Because he could have been discharged only for cause, plaintiff had a property interest in his employment that was entitled to constitutional protection.”
- “Because he could have been discharged only for cause, plaintiff had a property interest in his employment that was entitled to constitutional protection.”
- “Because he could have been discharged only for cause, plaintiff had a property interest in his employment that was entitled to constitutional protection.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffrin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.