Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps South, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “collective weight” of evidence of “several misrepresentations . . . made to the PTO” sup- ported finding of deceptive intent
• concluding “collective weight” of evidence of “several misrepresentations . . . made to the PTO” sup- ported finding of deceptive intent
• explaining collateral estoppel applies when “the differences between the unadjudicated patent claims and adjudicated patent claims do not materially alter the question” at issue
• explaining collateral estoppel applies when “the differences between the unadjudicated patent claims and adjudicated patent claims do not materially alter the question” at issue
• affirming summary judgment based on issue preclusion where patent owner did not offer “any explanation regarding how” a differently worded limitation in the claims of a child patent was “patentably significant”
• finding collateral estoppel where the patentee failed to explain how the specific limitation of a “block copolymer gel” in the unadjudicated claim would change the invalidity analysis of a substantially identical claim requiring a more general “polymeric gel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).