Ohio v. Richter Concrete Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting state Attorney General to communicate with putative class members after class certification was denied because salaried Attorney General, unlike private attorneys, had no interest in soliciting litigation or fees
• permitting state Attorney General to communicate with putative class members after class certification was denied because salaried Attorney General, unlike private attorneys, had no interest in soliciting litigation or fees
• order’s proscription did not apply to government attorneys because there was no danger of solicitation for financial gain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange Litigation
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-02-26· cited 262×
• In re Plywood Anti-trust Litigation
  E.D. Louisiana· 1976-03-15· cited 45×
• Fuzie v. Manor Care, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 1977-07-05· cited 21×
• McKenna v. Champion International Corp.
  Eighth Circuit· 1984-11-06· cited 11×
• Zarate v. Younglove
  C.D. California· 1980-02-12· cited 8×
• Oswald v. General Motors Corp.
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-02-26· cited 6×
• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 1984-11-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lynne Carol Fashions, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Cranston Print Works Co., Inc
  Third Circuit· 1972-01-17· cited 65×
• Rachal v. Hill
  Fifth Circuit· 1970-12-03· cited 55×
• Utah v. American Pipe & Construction Co.
  C.D. California· 1969-12-17· cited 22×
• Bill Minielli Cement Contracting, Inc. v. Richter Concrete Corp.
  S.D. Ohio· 1973-06-29· cited 9×
• Worthen Bank & Trust Co. v. National BankAmericard Inc.
  E.D. Arkansas· 1972-07-19· cited 7×