Ohio State Life Insurance Company v. Ray A. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that policyholders had \a vested contract right to the beneficial interest in the surplus\ of the issuing non-mutual insurance company
• holding that policyholders had “a vested contract right to the beneficial interest in the surplus” of the issuing non-mutual insurance company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).