Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Pro-Net Fin., Inc. (Slip Opinion)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that knives from defendants' homes admissible to show defendants had means of committing crimes
• concluding no contextual incrimination where there were “discrepancies” between non-testifying codefendant’s statement and other evidence of incident
• finding probable cause to search defendant’s residence for knives, sneakers, clothing, and face masks
• immunized witness instruction not necessary where no testimony about grant of immunity being dependent on witness’s truthfulness elicited
• on motion for required finding of not guilty, court views evidence in the light most favorable to Commonwealth
• no contextual incrimination where codefen-dant’s out-of-court statement allegedly “ ‘pulled [defendant] into’ . . . demonstrably false alibi”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).