Ohio Legal Rights Service v. Buckeye Ranch, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting injunction under PAIMI Act in favor of state agency protection and advocacy system against private care-giver
• granting injunction under PAIMI Act in favor of state agency protection and advocacy system against private care-giver
• granting injunction under PAMII in favor of P & A against private caregiver
• determining, with other courts, in a case involving a related Act, Protection and Advocacy for Mentally 111 Individuals Act (“PAMII”), that “protection and advocacy systems have standing to bring actions for declaratory or injunctive relief in a judicial forum”
• “There is no dispute that a protection and advocacy agency’s inability to meets its federal statutory mandate to protect and advocate the rights of disabled people constitutes irreparable harm.”
• “There is no dispute that a protection and advocacy agency’s inability to meet its federal statutory mandate to protect and advocate the rights of disabled people constitutes irreparable harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).