Ohio ex rel. Earnhart v. Ohio Power Siting Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is plainly obvious that evidence with the potential to disprove a plaintiffs theory or that would reveal a contributing cause of the damages is relevant to a case.
• prejudice in that defendant was prevented from developing alternative theories as to the cause of the accident
• “It is plainly obvious that evidence with the potential to disprove a plaintiff's theory or to reveal a contributing cause of the damages for which the defendant is not responsible is relevant to the case.”
• “It is plainly obvious that evidence with the potential to disprove a plaintiff's theory or to reveal a contributing cause of the damages for which the defendant is not responsible is relevant to the case.”
• “It is plainly obvious that evidence with the potential to disprove a plaintiff's theory or to reveal a contributing cause of the damages for which the defendant is not responsible is relevant to the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).