Skip to main content
· 11/14/2000

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency v. United States Department of Labor

Citations

  • 121 F. Supp. 2d 1155
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17062
  • 2000 WL 1721083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the prosecution by a private individual of an administrative whistleblower complaint against a state agency is barred by the Eleventh Amendment
  • holding that the prosecution by a private individual of an administrative whistleblower complaint against a state agency is barred by the Eleventh Amendment
  • stating that it would be \fundamentally unfair to terminate the administrative proceedings before the Department of Labor had an opportunity to exercise its discretion to intervene as a party\
  • stating that it would be “fundamentally unfair to terminate the administrative proceedings before the Department of Labor had an opportunity to exercise its discretion to intervene as a party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sargus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.