Skip to main content
· 10/22/1982

Ohio Citizens Bank v. Smith (In Re Smith)

Citations

  • 38 B.R. 685
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • this was just one basis for arguing excusa ble neglect although the court found that none constituted excusable neglect and that appellant had not even filed a motion for extension of time to file his notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Potter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.