Skip to main content
· 8/22/2003

Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 279 F. Supp. 2d 1281
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that an analogous auto exclusion forecloses coverage for a car accident, in which the negligent maintenance of the roadways was at issue, despite the fact that the exclusion did not mention claims concerning this type of negligence
  • specifically disagreeing with Westmoreland and holding that \arising out of\ is not vague or ambiguous for being undefined
  • rejecting the Westmoreland court’s conclusion regarding the concurrent cause doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryskamp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.