Ohio Casualty Group of Insurance v. Bakaric

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “resulting from” was narrower than the standard “arising out of’ language
• stating that “resulting from” was narrower than the standard “arising out of” language
• refusing to interpret an incident where a husband shot his wife in the face in the front seat of a car as one arising from the use of a motor vehicle
• collecting cases in the related no-fault context to synthesize the rule
• Passenger-wife being shot by driver-husband as they sat in husband’s car not “resulting from the use” of the car.
• automobile liability insurance did not cover a shooting which occurred in an automobile because the accident did not arise out of the use of the vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).