Skip to main content
· 4/21/1925

Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.

Citations

  • 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a third-party complaint was correctly 23 dismissed because “[i]ndemnity is unavailable under the federal securities laws”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Day, Jones, Kinkade, Marshall, Matthias, Modification, Proposition, Robinson, Syllabus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.