O'HARA v. Kovens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the separation of powers doctrine preserves to the one branch of government its essential functions and prohibits any other branch from interfering with or usurping those functions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McCulloch v. Glendening
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-10· cited 32×
• Office of the Public Defender v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-16· cited 28×
• Getty v. Carroll County Board of Elections
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-21· cited 17×
• Montgomery County v. Schooley
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-08· cited 17×
• State v. Braverman
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-06-01· cited 9×
• Lomax v. Warden
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-07· cited 6×
• In Re Adoption/Guardianship of DUSTIN R.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-21· cited 3×
• White v. Register of Wills of Anne Arundel County
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-05-01· cited 2×

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Nixon
  Supreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
• Powell v. McCormack
  Supreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 3,053×
• Tenney v. Brandhove
  Supreme Court· 1951-05-21· cited 1,470×
• Myers v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1926-10-25· cited 897×
• United States v. Reynolds
  Supreme Court· 1953-03-09· cited 873×
• Gravel v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 778×
• Springer v. Government of Philippine Islands
  Supreme Court· 1928-05-14· cited 402×
• Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Director, Office of Science and Technology
  D.C. Circuit· 1971-04-13· cited 394×
• United States v. Gillock
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-19· cited 253×
• Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena
  District of Columbia· 1966-05-18· cited 251×
• United States v. Mandel
  Fourth Circuit· 1979-01-11· cited 246×
• Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-27· cited 206×
• United States v. George S. Bush & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1940-05-20· cited 167×
• Murray W. Miller, Cross-Appellee v. Transamerican Press, Inc., Cross-Appellants, and Sam Steiger, Deponent, Cross-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-06-24· cited 167×
• Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-03-19· cited 161×
• Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of Assessments
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-09-09· cited 113×
• O'HARA v. Kovens
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-02-03· cited 99×
• Geisz v. Greater Baltimore Medical Center
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-08-05· cited 88×
• United States Cane Sugar Refiners' Ass'n v. Block
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1982-07-14· cited 85×
• Hammond v. Lancaster
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1950-02-09· cited 82×