· 3/26/2001
O'HARA v. Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Citations
- 171 F. Supp. 2d 490
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12525
- 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 239
- 2001 WL 833727
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that IUP enjoyed Eleventh Amendment immunity
- “The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has not waived its immunity in § 1983 civil rights cases and Congress did not abrogate state immunity in general in enacting civil rights legislation, including § 1983.”
- “The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has not waived its immunity in § 1983 civil rights cases (42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8521) and Congress did not abrogate state immunity in general in enacting civil rights legislation, including § 1983.”
- “The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has not waived its immunity in § 1983 civil rights cases (42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8521) and Congress did not abrogate state immunity in general in enacting civil rights legislation, including § 1983.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ambrose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.