O'Hara v. Globe Iron & Foundry Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a party may not raise one argument below and an alternate argument on appeal
• providing that a party may not raise one argument below and an alternate argument on appeal
• stating public opposition furnishes a rational basis for disparate treatment in zoning decisions
• finding the fact that the property had always been used as a golf course necessarily meant the owner's primary expectation was to continue using the property as a golf course, not to build houses on the land
• \It is not the function of the courts to pass upon the wisdom or folly of municipal ordinances or regulations.\ (citation omitted)
• first citing Carolina Chloride, Inc. v. Richland Cnty., 394 S.C. 154, 171, 714 S.E.2d 869, 877 (2011); and then citing Ex parte Brown, 393 S.C. 214, 224, 711 S.E.2d 899, 904 (2011)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).