Ogunde v. Prison Health Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the purpose of the contract was to provide health care for up to 6000 inmates at correctional facilities, each such inmate is an intended third-party beneficiary
• holding that where the purpose of the contract was to provide health care for up to 6000 inmates at correctional facilities, each such inmate is an intended third-party beneficiary
• finding prison physicians were independent contractors and therefore not entitled to sovereign immunity
• the Supreme Court of Virginia found that the trial court had erred in dismissing plaintiffs claims for medical malpractice and breach of contract
• “[W]e are not bound to accept conclusory allegations in a review of a demurrer[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).