· 9/6/1985
Ogontz Controls Co. v. Pirkle
Citations
- 499 A.2d 593
- 346 Pa. Super. 253
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding harm was a “certainty,” where an employee was engaged in unfair competition with his former employer
- although the trial court conducted a hearing within five days of issuing an ex parte injunction, it erred by continuing the preliminary injunction without allowing the objecting party to present evidence at the abbreviated hearing
- although the trial court conducted a hearing within five days of issuing an ex parte injunction, it erred by continuing the preliminary injunction without allowing the objecting party to present evidence at the abbreviated hearing
- although the trial court conducted a hearing within five days of issuing an ex parte injunction, it erred by continuing the preliminary injunction - 10 - J-S59037-14 without allowing the objecting party to present evidence at the abbreviated hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Montemuro, Popovich, Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.