Skip to main content
· 9/6/1985

Ogontz Controls Co. v. Pirkle

Citations

  • 499 A.2d 593
  • 346 Pa. Super. 253
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding harm was a “certainty,” where an employee was engaged in unfair competition with his former employer
  • although the trial court conducted a hearing within five days of issuing an ex parte injunction, it erred by continuing the preliminary injunction without allowing the objecting party to present evidence at the abbreviated hearing
  • although the trial court conducted a hearing within five days of issuing an ex parte injunction, it erred by continuing the preliminary injunction without allowing the objecting party to present evidence at the abbreviated hearing
  • although the trial court conducted a hearing within five days of issuing an ex parte injunction, it erred by continuing the preliminary injunction - 10 - J-S59037-14 without allowing the objecting party to present evidence at the abbreviated hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montemuro, Popovich, Watkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.