Ogle v. Nooth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the state’s argument that, under ORS 138.580, a petitioner must make a prima facie case on each of his claims; rather, “the attached evidence need only support— that is, verify, corroborate, or substantiate — the allegations in the petition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ogle v. Nooth
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-06-12· cited 39×
• State v. Palomo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-08· cited 2×
• State v. Gardner-Rolph
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-17· cited 2×
• Cavitt v. Coursey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-06· cited 1×
• Tolle v. Franke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-19· cited 1×
• Ross v. Franke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-30
• Ellett v. Coursey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Stanley v. Mueller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1957-09-06· cited 48×
• Billings v. Gates
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 39×
• Young v. Hill
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 26×
• Horn v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-13· cited 25×
• Benzinger v. Oregon Department of Insurance & Finance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-06-05· cited 7×
• Pedroso v. Nooth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-15· cited 6×