Oglala Sioux Tribe v. NRC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the rules of contract construction require giving effect to all of the provisions of a contract, construing it as a whole, and reconciling its clauses
• reversing trial court finding of mutual mistake because there was no evidence that both parties were mutually mistaken about the same fact but simply disagreed on the contracts meaning
• reversing trial court finding of mutual mistake because there was no evidence that both parties were mutually mistaken about the same fact but simply disagreed on the contracts meaning
• reversing the trial court's finding of mutual mistake because there was \no evidence that both parties were mutually mistaken about the same fact\; they \simply disagreed on the meaning of the contract\
• “mutual mistake exists where both parties are mutually mistaken about the same material fact”
• “mutual mistake exists where both parties are mutually mistaken about the same material fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).