Ogden v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the driver of a vehicle was not a permissive driver under Arizona law entitled to liability coverage; rather, the driver was driving a vehicle that he owned, and the insured could not give the driver permission to drive the vehicle actually owned by the driver
• “An insurer with a potential coverage defense loses its right to later litigate coverage if it defends its insured without a properly communicated reservation of rights.”
• “USF & G acknowledged by letter that its policy provided coverage to J.M. and Soykos, and it advised that it was defending those parties unconditionally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).